On the Name of Methadone Anonymous

Policy Statement

Number 6

August 1995

NAMA is well aware of the importance Methadone Anonymous has had on

patients across the United States. Organizing a 12 step group is hard work and

the commitment of Methadone Anonymous to the recovery of methadone patients is

apparent. Methadone Anonymous contends with the same discrimination and stigma

that NAMA has battled with. We believe that Methadone Anonymous, like NAMA are

methadone advocates and believe in the same things we do and is on our side.

NAMA is not against 12 step groups, nor, for that matter, Methadone Anonymous.

In fact we have facilitated a 12 step group here in New York called, Methadone

Is Recovery. The reason that we worked so hard to set up a 12 step group is for

the same reason that Methadone Anonymous also worked hard to organize and exists

— because methadone patients are sometimes excluded from other 12 step groups

and Narcotics Anonymous (NA) has specifically excluded methadone patients. But

no only are methadone patients excluded from many NA groups, very often if they

attempt to participate that are ostracized and humiliated in front of their

community of recovering addicts by — of all people — other recovering

addicts.. And while we are aware that some NA groups allow the full

participation of methadone patients, the national policy of Narcotics Anonymous

considers methadone patients on a substance and therefore excludes them.

Alcoholics Anonymous is quite different; their national policy states that

“members should not play doctor” and therefore do not exclude

methadone patients from participating. Unfortunately, many local AA groups do

not follow national policy and exclude methadone patients. How ironic this is

when it was AA, the father of all these groups that fought so hard for the

disease concept of alcoholism to then be the ones to discriminate against

patients who are being treated medically for their addiction.

NAMA applauds the work of people who have set up 12 step programs for

methadone patients. It is only the name that we believe adds to the confusion

and discrimination of all methadone patients, especially those patients who are

functioning, paying their taxes and supporting their family like anyone else but

must live every day in fear of being found out. Many methadone patients can not

even tell their families, or the person that they live with that they are on

methadone.

As an advocacy group we believe that NAMA must object to the name Methadone

Anonymous because it adds to the confusion about the medication methadone and

thereby contributes to the prejudice and discrimination of all methadone

patients. NAMA wants to make it clear that it is only the name Methadone

Anonymous that we dispute. NAMA applauds the work of Methadone Anonymous and

others who have set up 12 step programs for methadone patients.

NAMA is concerned with quality treatment and the human rights of methadone

patients to be treated with dignity, this is what we fight against and struggle

with. We are concerned about ALL methadone patients and things that affect the

quality of life for ALL methadone patients.

This is why we believe that the name, and please remember it’s only the name,

“Methadone Anonymous” is confusing and only adds to the misconceptions

and myths about methadone. When we first heard about Methadone Anonymous NAMA

was concerned about the confusion that the name of group could create. So we

conducted a “man in the street” survey, interviewing about 100 people

from all walks of life.

We asked people:

“What do you think Methadone Anonymous is?”

Most of the answers were, “It’s a detox group” or “for people

wanting to get off methadone”, or a group “for people who have detoxed

from methadone.” Very few answered correctly, less than 18% responded that

Methadone Anonymous was a 12-step group for and by methadone patients.

In other words, no one understood what

exactly Methadone Anonymous was for!

This made it clear to NAMA–as we had suspected–that the name Methadone

Anonymous was confusing to people.

And this is where the confusion lies. Aren’t all the Anonymous groups

struggling with the work preceding Anonymous? For example, Alcoholics anonymous

struggles with alcohol, Gamblers Anonymous struggles with gambling, Cocaine

Anonymous struggles with cocaine, Over Eaters Anonymous struggles with over

eating. So then what does Methadone Anonymous struggle with? Methadone!

Would not “Heroin Anonymous” be more correct? Methadone patients

are struggling with heroin, not methadone!

But we also wonder why a methadone group would mimic Narcotics Anonymous, a

groups that has historically stigmatized and ostracized methadone patients and

refuses to recognize the recovery and accomplishments of methadone patients.

We hope that Methadone Anonymous will consider our position on this issue. We

do not expect Methadone Anonymous to change their name, but we hope that you

will consider the impact this has on ALL methadone patients. Despite our

disagreement regarding the name, NAMA applauds the work of Methadone anonymous

for creating and providing a welcome 12 step group for methadone patients.

[Download PDF] 

[Next Policy Statement]

[Index Policy Statements]

Similar Posts

  • NAMA Education Series

    Admin 12/01/2021

    Number 1 Methadone Maintenance and Patient Self AdvocacyBy Arlene Ford (March, 1991). Number 2 Drug Policy in the Age of AIDS – The Philosophy of Harm ReductionBy Rod Sorge (April, 1991). Number 3 Myths About Methadone By Emmett Velten (March, 1992). Number 4 Methadone, HIV Infection, and Immune FunctionBy Herman Joseph (August, 1994). Number 5…

  • AMTA Conference Comittee

    Admin 06/15/2023

    Conference 2000 American Methadone Treatment Association April 9-12, 2000 San Francisco Committee Chair John Finger Committee Members Assistant to the Chair, Michael Garrett Co-chair, Alice Diorio Committee James DePasquale Becky Duarte Barbara Finger Carlos Franco Greg Keller Howard Lotsof Judith Ostergard Carmen Pearman Diane Seaman Joycelyn Woods NAMA Events and Activities Exhibition Booth Booth Manager:…

  • Executive Report

    Admin 03/21/2022

    LetterTo The Editor Birminghan Post-Herald, October 27, 2004 Re: JUDGE RULES AGAINST METHADONE CLINIC by JOSEPH D. BRYANT. Reporter Bryant, My name is J.R. Neuberger and I am part of an organization called The National Alliance of Methadone Advocates. I am also a methadone patient and have been since 1988. It has saved my life….

  • Contact Webmaster

    Admin 12/06/2022

    NAMA Recovery does not presently have a webmaster. This site is being maintained by: Joycelyn Woods, M.A., C.M.A.:  . Walter Ginter, C.M.A.:  Do you have Programming Skills? NAMA Recovery needs a webmaster. It is volunteer and would require about 10 hours a week Contact Joycelyn Woods or Walter Ginter above. This website is best viewed…

  • Submit a Concern

    Admin 07/03/2021

    Report a Program for NOT Following Federal Recommended Guidelines, COVID-19 Social Distancing and other Protections (for patients and staff) THIS FORM IS IN BETA AND NOT WORKING AT THIS TIME Program Information Name of Program *Name of Program Program Location * Address of ProgramStreet AddressApt, Suite, Bldg. (optional)CityState / Province / RegionPostal / Zip CodeAfghanistanAlbaniaAlgeriaAndorraAngolaAntigua…

  • The National Alliance Of Methadone Advocates “Together We Can Make A Difference”

    Admin 12/07/2022

    Education Series Number 4 August 1994 Methadone, HIV Infection and Immune Function by Herman Joseph Studies undertaken over the past two decades, primarily by Dr. Mary Jeanne Kreek of The Rockefeller University, and corroborated by other scientists throughout the world have established the long-term medical safety of methadone maintenance treatment (Kreek, 1992; Kreek, 1987; Kreek,…